Tuesday, June 3, 2008

I Pronounce Thee: Lehman Day

Financials are in the news again. LEH may be working on raising billions in capital as analysts predict the company will report its first quarterly loss since the company went public in 1994. This may float a little tailwind behind Brokers out of the gate, but I'm still playing Financials with bearish puts.

7:45 am MT: I stopped DO for a 30% loss on a half-sized position. I took profits on CNX for a 10% gain, and I took profits on BTU for an 8% gain. I also entered small put positions on MS and MCO. I locked CNX and BTU because I still have a nice position on MEE, and I don't want too much in any one area. Energy and Commodity stocks look like they are catching a little bid this morning, so I will continue to scale out of FLWT and some others as we go along today.

8:45 am MT: I sold the last of FWLT for a 1.87 gain, or 42% profit. It may still keep going, but I'm comfortable with the gain, especially in these market conditions. I also nibbled some calls on MOS, which I may turn into a little intra-day trade.

8:50 am MT: I sold MEE for a small 4% gain. I really think the market is quivering and shaking a little, and could be poised to fade off through the middle of the day (hence all the puts I'm trading). I could be wrong, but I decided to cut way back on my long (call) positions.

8:55 am MT: I sold HES at breakeven. Under most conditions I would be absolutely excited about buying calls on a nice bounce like HES, but these aren't most conditions. Again, I could be wrong, and maybe my radar is being goofed by the microwave oven interfering with my tin foil hat, but it seems like the market may want to fade. As it is, I am keeping a few calls, and a lot of puts. All I can do is manage this and see if it works. We shall see.....

9:00 am MT: I locked and walked on PXP for a nice 1.10 profit, or 31% gain. Same story as HES, normally I would be crazy for a setup like this, but I'm taking profits sooner, rather than later, just as I said I would. I also time-stopped out of AA for a small .38 cent loss. I will re-visit the stock later if it picks up some momentum. I also sold the MOS calls at breakeven.

10:00 am MT: Here are some interesting Bullish and Bearish movers today:
Bullish: MUR, APC, ECA, NEM, RL, VRSN
Bearish: PCP, MS, UTX

I picked up a small put position on PCP.

11:00 am MT: I sold the PCP puts for an 8% gain in an hour. I may go back in to PCP on another intra-day bounce. I am getting to where I'm just diddling around today. I actually picked up mini-sized call positions on ECA, MUR, and APC. A technical bounce is a technical bounce, despite my misgivings, so I picked up a little position in each of those stocks. I have more than enough positions, and I will probably continue to exit some profitable trades as the day goes along.

11:20 am MT: I culled out MCO for a .40 cent loss on a half-sizer. I also re-assessed my positions and decided that I had too many, and that I still don't like the Energy call, despite the technical bounce. So I culled the three trades that I just did: ECA was a .30 cent loss, MUR was a .40 cent loss, and APC was a .45 cent loss, all on half-sized positions. I'm going to get up and go out and take a walk. I can tell that I'm trying to make something out of what may be nothing. Under normal conditions I would be loading up on the Energy bounces, but I just think its a bear trap. I think the Big Institutions may be playing a game here. I know I've said this a bunch of times today, but I think the market is poised to roll down. I'm willing to miss out on a major upswing in a number of stocks right now because of my Technical and Fundamental view.

I did re-enter PCP puts just before this latest drop. I played the July 120 puts earlier, and now I'm playing the July 115 puts. So far so good.

11:37 am MT: this may be it, this may be the market fade I was looking for. We shall see.....

12:25 pm MT: I locked down 1/3 of the GS puts for a nice 2.20 profit, or 21% gain so far. I also locked down 1/3 of my DIA puts for a nice 1.01 profit, or 25% gain so far. I locked down 1/3 of my QQQQ puts for a .50 cent profit, or 21% gain so far. I have orders in to lock in 1/3 of my MS and SPY puts as well.

12:40 pm MT: I sold the PCP puts for a 10% gain in 1 hour and 15 minutes. I'm not really in to taking the trades this quick, like on PCP twice today, but it gave me a move and I took it. I will need a little bigger upswing to re-enter a third time today, I probably won't get it, but we'll see.....

12:45 pm MT: I locked down the rest of the GS puts as it started to bounce. The total trade was a 2.40 profit, or 23% gain. LEH came in with some "defensive" news about their business, which started the whole bounce/short covering at the end of the day. I stopped MS before it went through my breakeven point for a small .05 cent gain. Here we go again.....Like I keep saying, keep the trades shorter, you'll be glad you did. I've had a nice, profitable day, but nothing, and I mean nothing went to the support or resistance areas I thought they would hit for the past several days. Everything turns in space. There's too much Fast Money futzing around with the market. I did pick up some more GS puts at the high of the 15m swing towards the end of the day, but as usual, I'm taking small positions.

1:50 pm MT: I sold the SPY puts for a .34 gain, or 8% profit. I then did the same thing I did with GS (and PCP earlier), I swapped the trade out for the next strike further out of the money. I traded a little delta for a cheaper position to reduce my risk. Now I'm back in to some new SPY puts that cost less, and have already picked up a little profit. I may look at MS again for some puts tomorrow, but I'm not sure yet, I want to see how the market reacts to the LEH "news bogey" overnight. As it is, I'm not super excited about the MS chart, or the KSS chart for that matter. So I could end up doing nothing on MS, and time-stopping KSS. We'll see what happens tomorrow.

3:00 pm MT: Market Wrap: It was all about Lehman today.....Lehman, Lehman, Lehman.....Lehman here and Lehman there, Lehman everywhere! There are no other stocks in the universe, only Lehman. Lehman is the economy, Lehman is the market, Lehman is all knowing.....Lehman is.....the Answer! Leeeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhhmmmmennnnnnnnnnn! Yesssssss!

Ok, seriously, don't get caught up in the Lehman news bogeys. Keep playing the charts. The market indexes continued to roll over today, with the Dow being the most bearish, and the Naz being the most reluctant. I was right about the Energy bounces, at least for today. Those stocks faded off and are looking a lot choppier than they were going into the day. The strengthening Dollar acted as a catalyst for some of the selling. It looks like Energy and Commodity stocks have another couple of days of consolidation. Maybe the Oil Inventory Report tomorrow will act as some kind of bullish or bearish catalyst (especially if the Energy Department can actually report real numbers.....). As it is, it still looks like the Dow has a pretty good chance of dropping down to the 12,200 - 12,300 support area, which means that the market could still drop for another day or two, we shall see.....

23 comments:

  1. Dwight,

    How does this give the brokers a little boost in the morning. How does the futures look at this as positive news.


    Thanks
    Chic

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chic: raising capital allows LEH to remain solvent on their banking services. The fact that some institution would loan them money means they believe LEH can recover sooner, rather than later.

    ReplyDelete
  3. How about ADM puts? Bought a 1/2 size at $38.71

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bob: I saw that on ADM, I had enough puts already, but that was on my list. You did a nice job jumping on that one.

    ReplyDelete
  5. denise,

    Looking good for your SPY put @ 1:40 EST. Hope you didn't sell it yet?

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  6. Guys,

    I gotta say... all the Q&A has been really helpful to me, especially the lengthy and detailed answers from DA.

    I'm learnin' a lot!...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Gary, Dwight and Blog Buddies,

    No I left SPY this morning I'm such a chicken. I took a profit on RACK and ACI (I shouldn't have left ACI - Darn) then hopped into MOS and bought 2 contracts which I think you helped explain how to handle 2 contracts and Dwight has explained it many times - today on MOS it was good move!! It helped to make up for the SPY loss. But then unfortunatley, I got nailed on WLT after that. I actually had a profit at one point and considered taking it and of course not knowing what was around the corner!! Bye, Denise

    ReplyDelete
  8. DA and fellow blog-ees, I sold the GS put for a 45% gain, 1/2 Spys for 61%, 1/2 DIA for 45% 1/3 of MER for 14%.

    Now for the bad news, stopped out of MCO twice, MOS, CLF and MEE.

    Still holding 1/2 of ADM, full Q's and the remaining portions of the SPY, DIA, MER.

    All for a grand total of $45.49 profit. It could've been much worse. I was very much in the red mid-day. On the other hand prior to the LEH news bogie, I was much more in the black...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dwight

    I have been following your blog for about one month although have not caught one of your VC. A couple of questions about today. One, what do you mean when you say you took half size positions. How many? Two, in taking all these positions are you going in with a specific reward:risk ratio, say 2 to 1, or are using another target measure?

    Thanks, Ed

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dwight,

    Okay, I think I have a stupid question to ask about something that I struggle with often. EWZ, it has broken diagonal support but not horizontal at 95. Should this trade have been exited? I'm down .97 on a $4 July call so the risk/reward makes sense. I'm having a hard time with this on a lot of trades right now.

    Thanks,

    Gary

    ReplyDelete
  11. Bob: yeah, another tough day of staying on top of the whips and saws. What a fun year! You did it, though, and stayed in the green. You probably outperformed a lot of Fund Managers today. By the way, I can't decide if I like the spelling bogey or bogie. They're both accurate, and seem to be interchangeable for "enemy aircraft" (or UFO's as I like to think of them). Although in Golf it's spelled bogey. I guess it's better than news booger, which would still be appropriate because it leaves a bad taste in your mouth.....

    Ed: a half-sized position means I'm scaling in to the play with a smaller than normal trade size. I will often add to the play later, if the buy signals are still there. It's a way of keeping risk down when the windshield is a little muddy. I usually end up with a 2:1 risk to reward ratio (or better). But if the setup has a 70-80% probability of success, I'll drop it down to 1:1 if I need to.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Gary: as soon as a stock (like EWZ) goes more than 1% (or 1-2% if you choose) below the low of the previous day (on a normal sized candle) in an upswing, I exit. Especially if it comes after a confirmed bounce, which EWZ had 5 trading days ago.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wow, Dwight. And I thought I might be overdoing it. I was tapping so fast on my PDA, woodpeckers began gathering around me. You must have worn out your keyboard. Still, a nice profitable day. My only loser (out of 10 positions) was CNX. Getting better.

    So is Lehman the new cult stock?

    Daniel

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hey, has any heard anything about Lehman? I think I heard them mentioned on cnbc today. ha .. ha

    ReplyDelete
  15. I've got a question. How come my puts go up and my calls go down? If anyone wants to make some money just let me know and I will do the opposite and it will work for ya :)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dwight maybe you can help settle a dispute. I think that if you know support, resistance, and candlestick patterns well enough that you wouldnt want to use 3,4, or 5 different indicators. I say they can confuse you or give you late signals or even false signals. He says that when entering a trade the more confirmation you have with all the indicators the better or maybe even safer the entry will be. Wich way do you think is better and why?

    Thank you for your time.

    p.s. the page was a great read today as always

    ReplyDelete
  17. Dwight and Steve,

    I've discovered just in the past week or so that when I remove the studies all together I locate the various levels of support and resistance easier.Also, the candles moving in a channel are easier to spot and the multiple touchpoints stand out on the trendline with a blank background.

    I'm just dreaming, but I bet it would be fun to trade in a bull market. I've only been doing real trades for 8 months so if we learn under these circumstances it could actully turn out to be a real blessing in the long run. Bye, Denise

    ReplyDelete
  18. Dwight, Gary and Bob
    Thanks for explaining the multple contract , zones and scaling in and out.
    I had to read everyones comments lke 3 tmes just so I would GET it :) stll not sure that I completely understand.

    Dwght , oh yes, I am interested n this concept b/c my one contract systen IS NOT working, yet I have a small account , hence my problem of maing this scalng n and out work or so I thnk. Any thoughts?

    I am looking at CHTT for put entry .trigger on 60 min chart f break dagonal support line with stop at 60 does that sound reasonable ?
    Thanks
    Claudia

    ReplyDelete
  19. Dwight
    re: your answer to Gary's queston on EWZ. you said you take your exit as soon as the stock falls 1% below the low of the previous day - do you do this immedately as it happens during the day regardless of anything ( ie volume ) and regardless the intraday dfferent charts? I ASK THIS B/C THE 5, 15 30 60 MIN CHARTS ALL HAVE DIFFERENT CANDLES

    ReplyDelete
  20. Dwight and Gang,

    I scaled 100% out of QQQQ and 2/3 out of my puts on the DIA, SPY and MS when market sold off this afternoon.

    I got stop out of AA with max loss. Dwight, did you get stopped out today on AA. It kissed the 30 day moving average but that was below my support.

    I am still carrying KSS, COF and JWN. I am little concerned about those positions. I really felt like they were in good position to roll over today but should some strength. We will see what tomorrow brings.

    Enjoy reading the blogs. I will try to post some of my set ups and/or entry positions during the day. I noticed that some people are posting things that they see during the day. I think that helps everyone get better with set ups and entries. Thanks to those doing it already.

    Dwight, as always "You the Man" That kinda goes with the golf theme. Just think of all us saying that everytime you post on the blog because believe me that's exactly what we are saying.

    Chic

    ReplyDelete
  21. Dwight, i'm sorry, now my friend is saying that you especially need the indicators if you are day trading because that is totally different and I am telling him it is the same in all time frames daily, 60 min, 30 min and so on.
    You dont need indicators.

    Please help.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Daniel: very nice trading today, great job! And LEH isn't a "Cult Stock" it's a "Weather Vane Stock" right now. Traders are using it (too much, as usual) as a barometer for Financials.

    Steve: who is "he" that says you have to use 3-4 indicators to get the true, really, really, super duper really, do the safety dance really, it's ok to buy now signal? You don't have to mention names if it will embarrass someone. I'm just curious if it's an "educator" of some sort. Needless to say, Steve, you win that dispute. All indicators are a derivative of price (or volume). Sometimes they can be useful, but they are not so important that you have to have them confirm a trade. I have made hundreds of trades in the last several months, and on only about 20% on the trades did I use anything other than price and volume, and that was almost always moving averages or fibs.

    Denise: your right about being able to see the chart better without a lot of extra "indicators" on the screen. I remember watching an "educator" from my Wade Cook days, (who once wrote a forward in a very popular book on patterns), who had so many lines and indicators on his charts that I knew immediately he didn't know how to really trade. It looked impressive in a workshop, and it made him a lot of sales, but it was garbage.

    Claudia: regarding one contract trades: take the highest probability signals, trade when the swings are clearer to see, and don't try to finesse the exits for the last penny possible. As for the CHTT put, you're way late on the entry, it's getting pretty overcooked now. It might keep going, but you missed the higher probability/lower risk entry. In addition, the ITM option spreads are too wide Also, on the 1% trailing stop rule (for confirmed swing bounces), I use the daily candles, and yes, I pull the trigger. Sometimes I don't wait when I can smell the momo going away early, like on those Energy plays intra-day today. I would have lost thousands instead of hundreds if I hadn't been sharp on my momentum and market analysis.

    Chic: see the 9:00 am MT post for the AA time stop, and see the 1:50 pm MT post for what I think of KSS. Also, very nice job of scaling out of the puts as the market dumped. You actually did better than me on MS, nice work today on those.

    ReplyDelete
  23. SteveC (and Ken),

    I've been reading Kohler's blog for over 9 months now, and unless I missed something, Kohler cautions AGAINST using 300 different indicators. I've always known him to preach price first and volume second.

    Occasionally I have seen him use various indicators (7,3 Stochastic; RSI2,14) to highlight divergences and such, but not for much else.

    In fact, on his "old" blog, he has a post called "Moving Averages are Worthless." He points out that moving averages can have their place in a successful, mechanical trading system, but they should not be THE thing that ALWAYS tells you to buy or sell. Plus, on his video weekly watchlist, he usually presents his ideas by showing the chart, the lines he's drawn in, and sometimes volume, sometimes not.

    I learned to draw my lines under Jeff's "tutelage," and thus, stopped using moving averages altogether.

    Guys, let me know if that sounds like an accurate description of Kohler's teaching...

    ReplyDelete